Reading framework

Research Terminology

A consistent vocabulary for reading historical evidence without confusing a research result with live performance, suitability, or a forecast.

01 / Evidence labels

Performance metrics

Risk-adjusted return
Historical results considered in relation to the variability observed over the same research period. It is descriptive, not a forecast.
Historical return
The change recorded over a stated historical test period. Cost and compounding assumptions must be read with the methodology.
Trading activity
How much portfolio composition changes through time. It indicates implementation demand but is not a complete transaction-cost estimate.
Peak-to-trough decline
The largest observed decline from a prior high in the presented historical sequence.
Portfolio breadth
The combined number of reported long and short positions. It does not by itself establish diversification, capacity, or independent bets.
Performance index
A base-100 representation of compounded historical changes, used to compare the path through time rather than capital value.

02 / Research Quality Review

Six review lenses

Historical consistency
Whether the observed historical pattern remains coherent across the available periods and tests.
Signal efficiency
Whether the evidence supports a useful relationship between signal strength, variability, and implementation demand.
Implementation practicality
Whether activity, costs, liquidity, timing, and operational requirements appear practicable under the stated assumptions.
Portfolio breadth
Whether the reported position count and concentration evidence are sufficient to assess how broadly the strategy is expressed.
Market breadth transfer
Whether the idea has evidence of retaining its character beyond the market segment in which it was first examined.
Data coherence
Whether coverage, chronology, observation counts, and missing-data treatment form a coherent research record.

03 / Evidence state

Review states

Supported
The supplied evidence supports this review lens.
Needs review
The supplied evidence identifies a material weakness or unresolved concern.
Pending evidence
The supplied record does not yet contain enough evidence for a conclusion.